Main

July 13, 2006

Shorter Zidane: "Sorry y'all had to see that."

Zidane speaks about the incident with Materazzi on Canal+ TV

Zinedine Zidane spoke on French TV station Canal+ last night to explain why he headbutted Marco Materazzi in the World Cup final. He was quiet and dignified. He said there was a grave insult to his mother and sister, but did not specify what it was.

The Guardian: His repeated apologies were clearly heartfelt but they were carefully limited in scope. "My action was unforgiveable," he said. "It wasn't the right gesture to make. I say this aloud because two or three billion people saw it, and millions of children. I apologise to them, and to their teachers, the people who have to tell them about good behaviour. I have children myself, and I know what it's like. I will always tell them not to be taken advantage of, and to avoid this kind of situation."

But when asked if he regretted his decision to turn and butt Materazzi in the chest, he was adamant. "I can't regret it, because that would mean he was right to have said what he did."

"It's always the reaction that people talk about. Of course the reaction has to be punished. But if there had been no provocation, there would have been no reaction. If I reacted, it was because something occurred. Do you think that in a World Cup final, 10 minutes away from the end of my career, I would do a thing like that because it pleased me? Never. My action was unforgiveable, but I'm saying to you that the person who committed the provocation should also be punished."

FIFA apparently agrees - they will be investigating Materazzi's comments as well and based on the outcome, he could face a suspension and fine. Materazzi has also stated he believes Zidane should keep the Golden Ball award.

I spent several hours last night trying to find a full transcript of Zidane's remarks, but was unsuccessful. Here's another partial transcript from the BBC. (follow the link for more than I've excerpted here)

Interviewer: Everyone wants to know exactly what he said...

Zinedine Zidane: They were very serious things, very personal things.

Interviewer: About your mother and your sister?

Zinedine Zidane: Yes. They were very hard words. You hear them once and you try to move away.

But then you hear them twice, and then a third time... I am a man and some words are harder to hear than actions. I would rather have taken a blow to the face than hear that.

There's a lot to chew on here, but it's no surprise that Zidane has refused to repeat the insult. One columnist seems to be saying it's unique to Berber culture to refuse to repeat insults about other people, but I don't know about that - would many Americans repeat vile insults about their mothers and sisters on national television? My guess is that they would not.

As for the racism issue, it's still very unclear. Some English language papers have claimed that Zidane denied he or his family was called terrorists, but I've not seen that backed up in any interview excerpts so far, either in English or in French. In general, in the English language news coverage of this incident and the rumors flying around, there appears to be a great deal of confusion between "didn't confirm" and "denied" and "confirmed" and "didn't deny" - for example, Materazzi has denied insulting Zidane's mother, but he didn't mention his sister; I just saw a headline claiming Materazzi had confirmed he insulted Zidane's sister. My guess would be that at least some of it stems from translation problems. Bottom line: I can't tell if he said anything one way or the other on the racism issue.

Above all, I am a man.

I have to say that I understand and respect this. He regrets the effects of his action on his team and his country and on everyone who saw the match - he's sorry we had to see that - but he did what he had to do, in that moment, to preserve his essential human dignity. And he's paid a price. But those headlines on July 10th about Zizou walking off the field in shame? They were wrong. Zinedine Zidane did what he had to do; he paid his price; he made his apologies, but he's made no apology for who he is. In a 2004 interview, he said:

'It's hard to explain but I have a need to play intensely every day, to fight every match hard,' he told me. 'And this desire never to stop fighting is something else I learnt in the place where I grew up. And, for me, the most important thing is that I still know who I am. Every day I think about where I come from and I am still proud to be who I am: first, a Kabyle from La Castellane, then an Algerian from Marseille, and then a Frenchman.'

Walked off the field in shame? Never. Upon his brow shame is ashamed to sit.

July 12, 2006

Blatter Blather

FIFA president Sepp Blatter is aptly named, as many have commented during this year's World Cup, but today really takes the cake. He's threatening to take the Golden Ball award away from Zinedine Zidane.

"I have ordered our disciplinary committee to open an enquiry regarding that episode," said Blatter. "We will await the result before taking action. The presumption of innocence until proven otherwise is and remains a sacred principle."

He added in an interview to Italian national newspaper La Repubblica: "The winner of the award is not decided by Fifa but by an international commission of journalists. Having said that, Fifa's executive committee has the right and the duty to intervene when faced with behaviours that are against the ethic of sport."

Indeed they do. If the lip readers are correct and Materazzi made race-based insults to Zidane, FIFA must sanction him severely. In these circumstances if Zidane is stripped of his prize, it's nothing more than an endorsement of racism.

FIFA has not said whether they are investigating the content of the remarks that provoked Zidane. He is scheduled to do an interview on French television in a few hours, so if he decides to share what was said, we will know soon enough.

Of course FIFA cannot have people, deciding on the basis of Zidane's example, to headbutt others. No doubt this is a very serious concern. I'm curious how many people might actually make this decision, so let's have a little poll:

July 11, 2006

No, Italia, racist "trash talking" is NOT okay.

Should Zidane have headbutted Marco Materazzi? Duh, of course not. But in the face of vile racist comments of this nature, what Zidane “should have” done is completely and utterly beside the point. If people who love soccer are serious about dealing with the problem of racism, they will recognize this, that it’s completely unjust and morally bankrupt to insist that players withstand racial abuse with grace and a smile and never... ever... crack. It gives free license to the racists. That is a much greater wrong than a headbutt.

Zizou shouldn’t have retaliated with violence; we know this; he knows this; he was sanctioned for it during the match and will likely be fined and receive a ban, or perhaps some other creative penalty given his impending retirement. He has received his punishment. He took it like the man and the player he is.

Now the question is: what we will do with players who call other players the sons of terrorist whores based on their heritage? And it looks like that question is going to be much harder to answer than it should. In discussions across the internet (see the Pandagon link in my previous post for but one example) those who would defend Zidane are being accused of saying that violence is an acceptable response to verbal abuse.

This is an interesting claim to make. It's very interesting. Because you see, I have yet to see anyone, anywhere say that Zidane should not have been sent off. No one is saying that because if you have even a minimal knowledge of the laws of the game, not to mention basic sports customs and human decency, it's impossible to make that argument.

Yet somehow, over and over again, statements like "Racist slurs are equally as unacceptable as headbutts" are being rebutted as though they were "It's okay to beat the shit out of people." So, excuse me, but what the fuck? For those confused at home, let's have a brief review.

1. Headbutting and other physical violence is not okay.
2. Racist slurs against other players are not okay.
3. Insults in general against other players are not okay.
4. Headbutts or other physical violence in response to 2. or 3. above is STILL not okay.

Now that we've got that cleared up, I will say this. What it all comes down to is that unless we are willing to enforce a vision, not just of the game of soccer, but of a world where hurling a racial insult is equally as unacceptable as a headbutt, there is little reason for any of us - you, me, or Zizou - to respect the structure of rules and social mores that exist. If headbutts are punished and racist insults are not, that gives the racists free license to say what they like, and "the rules," be it the Laws of the Game of soccer or the social mores by which we all live our lives, are nothing more than excuses for people with privilege and power to shit on those who don't have it.

Put another way: if racial abuse is condoned either explicitly or implicitly by the rules, why should those on the receiving end of the abuse respect or follow the rules? What have they - or we - to gain by doing so? Nothing at all, only the perpetuation of a system that abuses minorities.

And that is 100% NOT OKAY.

In case you haven't read it already, I'm going to link to Dave Zirin's column Why Today I Wear My Zidane Jersey and quote its hard-hitting conclusion, which he states better than I could:

We don't know with iron certainty what Materazzi said, but if it turns out to be more of the anti-Black, anti-Muslim, garbage that has infected soccer like a virus, the Italian team should forfeit the cup. They should voluntarily give the greatest trophy of them all back to FIFA as a statement that some things in this world are more important than sports. Racism will be the death of soccer if things don't change. Italy can set the sport back on course, with one simple, stunning gesture. Give the damn thing back.

Amen.

Zidane/Materazzi News and Opinion Roundup

Multiple newspapers have hired lip readers to try to determine exactly what Materazzi said to Zidane before getting his ass knocked to the turf. Here are some of the conclusions:

The Daily Mail and the Times agree with one another that it was something along the lines of "son of a terrorist whore" accompanied by "fuck off." And here is a summary of some of the other wordings mentioned, including "dirty terrorist," various insults against Zidane's sister or mother, and "Harki." Harki is a pejorative word for an Algerian who supported France in Algeria's independence war; it's an extreme insult. Materazzi has admitted to insulting Zidane and pulling his shirt, but has denied calling him a terrorist.

Here are some other must-reads:

Dave Zim: Why Today I Wear My Zidane Jersey
Pandagon: Threats Aren't Loudly Announced, They Are Usually Whispered
Abbas Raza of 3quarksdaily: Monday Musing: Zidane and Racism

My thoughts will follow.

April 26, 2006

Alert! High-Profile Black Woman Living Her Life As If She Had Every Right!

Carol Moseley Braun is starting up an organic food business, because she wants to "expand the availability of healthy foods" to "help people eat healthier." Okay. Presumably she also wants to earn money. Okay.

Anyone see a problem with this?

Apparently someone does. In this Chicago Tribune article, suddenly this bit of news trivia is morphed into a debate over whether it's - what, legitimate? appropriate? acceptable? for Braun to start a business.

It is unusual for former high-level politicians to go into the consumer products business in this way, especially using a government title as a brand name. "Pioneering yet again, here she goes," Braun joked last week. "Where no girl has gone before."

But her latest move provided grist for those who see her political career as a disappointment and Braun herself as someone with promise who proved unequal to the stature of the offices she held.

I'm afraid someone's going to have to spell out the connection for me. Entrepreneurs are lower on the totem pole than politicians now? Quick, somebody tell the Republicans in Congress! Because we need a tax code overhaul to incentivize public service, if this is true.

Continue reading "Alert! High-Profile Black Woman Living Her Life As If She Had Every Right!" »

April 10, 2006

National Day of Action for Immigrant Justice

Today is the National Day of Action for Immigrant Justice. There are major marches in Washington DC and a host of other cities. I wanted to go - I planned to go - but I've been sick all weekend, and it's probably the fucking flu. I have a doctor's appointment at 4pm, and I'll find out. Meantime, the show goes on. The Washington Post has an article with a route map. They're expecting as many as 180,000 people. If you are in the DC area and want to go, you can either meet up at Meridian Hill Park (aka Malcom X Park) before the 3:00 step-off - an email I got from PFAW had a call time of 2:00 pm - and march down 16th street, or meet the group at the Washington Monument around 4:00 or 4:30.

I want to talk a little bit about why this is an important issue. For anyone who has a doubt that racism is at the heart of this fuss over "illegals" I want to tell a story. Immigration was something of an issue during the 2005 governor's campaign in Virginia. I worked for the coordinated campaign for a few months, and canvassed every day. In certain areas - invariably the most McMansiony areas, mostly in and around Herndon, I started to find people who would name "Illegal Immigrants" as their issue. In Herndon at the time there was a big fuss over a day-labor center that had been proposed as a place where day laborers could gather, to prevent them gathering at gas stations and the like, which the property and business owners did not care for.

"Immigration" wasn't as big an issue as "Traffic" which was far and away the #1. But I got enough of this that I, and other canvassers, started to bug the higher-ups for talking points on "Immigration." Canvassers are very loathe to improvise, you see, because we get that instinct beat out of us very early on in our field careers. It's a very uncomfortable thing as a field staffer to be asked a question over and over that you haven't been given a ready answer to.

I was made all the more uncomfortable by the fact that I sensed that the real concern with "Illegal Immigrants" was something more along the lines of "I don't want those brown people living in my neighborhood." Then one day I had this confirmed for me in beautiful clarity. I was in a neighborhood of townhomes in Herndon. It looked like a nice neighborhood, a comfortable one, not upscale, but hardly a place where poor folk could afford to live. About half the residents (who answered the doors) were white, and about half were Hispanic. I'd been there for an hour or two when I knocked on the door of a white woman.

Continue reading "National Day of Action for Immigrant Justice" »

March 30, 2006

How dare you be present when men decide it's time to rape someone?!

The assault of an African-American women by three white members of Duke's lacrosse team has been getting wide coverage in the blogosphere, and now by a few major papers as well: Washington Post article here, New York Times here and here.

The blog Justice 4 Two Sisters is covering the whole story, while Ampersand has a link round up at Alas, A Blog.

Finally, Pandagon has some analysis of gang rape: The gang rape is the essential scene of the patriarchy.

As for me, I had a dustup with a co-worker over this at lunch today, fielding questions about why "they" are trying to make a racial issue out of this, why that woman was working as 'a dancer', why she had kids, why they didn't DNA test the one black guy on the team as well.

Answer key: (1) Because when someone yells racial slurs at you and attacks you, that is a racial issue, (2) Because she needed money to put herself through school and support her family (3) Because she had sex and got pregnant, and no that does not negate her right to consent to further sexual activity for the rest of her life, and (4) Because she said the attackers were white.

You would think we'd be past the time when women attack other women for daring to be raped. You would think.

March 29, 2006

Privilege

Remember Casey Casem and the Top Forty? Remember that horrible Bette Midler song, "Wind Beneath My Wings," that was used for the Request and Dedication at least once a month from the time it was released until... well, until I was too old to be interested in the Top Forty?

It must have been cold there in my shadow
To never have sunlight on your face.
You were content to let me shine, that's your way.
You always walked a step behind.

So I was the one with all the glory,
while you were the one with all the strength.
A beautiful face without a name for so long.
A beautiful smile to hide the pain.

I hate that song. Hate hate hate.

Could it start off any more condescending, for one? Notice that this supposed tribute to the "hero" who's suffered so long in silence never once shifts from the reference point of the speaker. It must have been cold! That must have hurt! You might have thought I didn't notice, but I did!

Continue reading "Privilege" »